In question is the European left following the events that shook the world. Except for honorable or anecdotal exceptions the European political landscape is clearly liberal or conservative, where the left rules, is basically, as in Spain, a reduction from its backend and to abandon their ethical and ideological principles. The latter is what has led to a distortion of the social trends of the continent.
is especially cynical that members of the European Socialist Party and other left formations particularly harsh criticism of free market that they have embraced and given shelter. Perhaps now call claiming positions including regulation and regulatory systems, but far from the pragmatic course of image advertising, where govern policy differs little from the neoliberal policies.
in economic circumstances that should be set as a new seed of social democracy, it seems that these formations are unable to echo the representation of the workforce, but when have not risen to defend the continuing global outsourcing drip industrial.
Socialists, despite the clearly international character birth ideologically motivated, have failed to adapt to the globalization process, perhaps suffering from some responsibility for historical complexion. This would explain why no one is able to provide solutions and alternatives to a model that looks can be harmful to the welfare state. The man, whether skilled worker or not, has become something that never ceased to be, for many messages spilled to the contrary. The employee is then as now, an instrument or system whose mission is nothing but to accept the working conditions imposed by the ruling class, the business today. Perhaps, government policies do not try and see to promote their company through expansion of economic cycles and business expansion.
I doubt the matter is that economic globalization has been accompanied by international regulation, after the diffusion process and industrial business has grown over state lines. The world is witnessing as companies are more powerful than the states themselves, as their branches are spread throughout the globle, breaking up factories here and there, as they see fit, depending on where you pay less tax, where the cost reduction will be most advantageous private benefit that have an impact social, without any ethical limitation, with few exceptions.
Therefore, the wage today can not claim to be a worker to use, because their area of \u200b\u200bwork has grown, life does not belong. The worker of today, as a tool of the free market, is obliged to accept the economic policies that promote the dismantling of the National Industry. " So this is also a system of free movement of people and capital, monetary and intellectual.
can speak of the welfare system where the individual lives, their destiny and their life projects depends where employment is believed that this depends on the will of the business. Can be called "Democracy" at a public election system which then act on the basis of corporate lobbyists, where policies were always aimed at perpetuating the system and not improve the quality of city life.
can he not address a means of social solutions, an alternative to predatory capitalism of human sensitivity. Can not find new ways of originality and innovation to avoid the tail cyclic system or the beginning of real social struggle for justice and freedom where the individual is not overly dependent on a illegitimate power.
0 comments:
Post a Comment